1958 Rover P5 vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Rover P5 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2008 Volvo S40.
Because 1958 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S40 (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Rover P5. (222 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Rover P5 | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | P5 | S40 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 222 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |