1958 Simca Vedette vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 263 kg more than 1958 Simca Vedette.
Because 1958 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Simca Vedette | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Simca | Mazda |
| Model | Vedette | 3 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1363 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4506 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2639 mm |
