1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 3,042 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 264 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
Make | Studebaker | Triumph |
Model | Silver Hawk | 1800 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3042 cc | 1774 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 6.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2550 mm |