1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk vs. 2012 Audi S6
To start off, 2012 Audi S6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S6 (414 HP) has 314 more horse power than 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk.
Because 2012 Audi S6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi S6 (500 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk | 2012 Audi S6 | |
Make | Studebaker | Audi |
Model | Silver Hawk | S6 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3042 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 414 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |