1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1970 Triumph 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 385 kg more than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Because 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Studebaker | Triumph |
Model | Sky Hawk | 1300 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1970 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2460 mm |