1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2009 Holden Barina
To start off, 2009 Holden Barina is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2009 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Studebaker | Holden |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Barina |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2779 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
