1958 Talbot 2500 vs. 2002 BMW Z3

To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Talbot 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1958 Talbot 2500. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot 2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1958 Talbot 2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Talbot 2500. (196 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Talbot 2500. 2002 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 1958 Talbot 2500 has manual transmission. 1958 Talbot 2500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: