1958 Talbot T 26 vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 1998 Acura EL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1998 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1998 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Talbot T 26 | 1998 Acura EL | |
| Make | Talbot | Acura |
| Model | T 26 | EL |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 4482 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1704 mm |
