1958 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 Honda CR-V is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda CR-V (180 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda CR-V weights approximately 346 kg more than 1958 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Master RR | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 180 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1556 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2619 mm |
