1958 Wartburg 312 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (158 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Wartburg 312 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Wartburg | Jeep |
| Model | 312 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 992 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1656 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2634 mm |
