1958 Wartburg 312 vs. 2012 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2012 Toyota Aygo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 998 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Aygo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Aygo (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Aygo should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Wartburg 312 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2012 Toyota Aygo.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Aygo (93 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (82 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Aygo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Wartburg 312 | 2012 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Wartburg | Toyota |
Model | 312 | Aygo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 900 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2340 mm |