1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 1959 Abarth 1600 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 555 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
| Model | 1600 | Tickford |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2600 mm |
