1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1952 Rover P4
To start off, 1959 Abarth 1600 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,101 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1952 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1952 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1952 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Abarth | Rover |
| Model | 1600 | P4 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2101 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 65.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 52 L |
