1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1961 Austin A 40
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1961 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | 1600 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2220 mm |
