1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Cadillac 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1600 | 62 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |