1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 177 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Abarth | Reliant |
| Model | 1600 | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 798 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |
