1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 1967 Mercury Park Lane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 385 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercury |
| Model | 1600 | Park Lane |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 6722 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 103 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3130 mm |
