1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1968 Chevrolet Nova
To start off, 1968 Chevrolet Nova is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 320 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1968 Chevrolet Nova | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1600 | Nova |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2830 mm |
