1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 1600 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2480 mm |
