1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1975 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1975 Lotus Eclat is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,972 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 90 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1975 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | 1600 | Eclat |
Year Released | 1959 | 1975 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2490 mm |