1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1976 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,007 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1976 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
Model | 1600 | 1609 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2007 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |