1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1980 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1980 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
Model | 1600 | 1609 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |