1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Celica weights approximately 220 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1600 | Celica |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |