1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1600 | Celeste |
Year Released | 1959 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2350 mm |