1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1986 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 1986 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 3,799 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 540 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1986 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Abarth | Pontiac |
| Model | 1600 | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2830 mm |
