1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1988 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1988 Ford RS 200 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,804 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1988 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1804 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 224 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2410 mm |