1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1992 Ford Probe
To start off, 1992 Ford Probe is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Probe weights approximately 302 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1992 Ford Probe | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Probe |
Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 84.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 227 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1277 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |