1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |