1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1995 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1995 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1995 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1995 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1995 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1600 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2680 mm |