1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 342 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1600 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2430 mm |