1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (184 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 935 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | Astro |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 184 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 88.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2830 mm |