1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2000 Kia Clarus
To start off, 2000 Kia Clarus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Clarus (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Clarus should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Clarus weights approximately 255 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2000 Kia Clarus | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 1600 | Clarus |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |