1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 635 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1600 | Celica |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |