1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 335 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |