1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1600 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |
