1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 919 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 1600 | Ram |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3530 mm |