1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |