1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
| Model | 1600 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2490 mm |
