1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1567 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1600 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2527 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2950 mm |
