1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2004 Ford Ka
To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ka weights approximately 145 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2004 Ford Ka | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Ka |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2730 mm |