1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Abarth | MCC |
Model | 1600 | Smart |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2370 mm |