1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2005 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 1600 (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Bantam weights approximately 158 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2005 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1753 cc |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1118 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2730 mm |