1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Scion xA (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Scion xA weights approximately 101 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 2005 Scion xA | |
| Make | Abarth | Scion |
| Model | 1600 | xA |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1061 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2380 mm |
