1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,785 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 125 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1600 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |
