1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2840 mm |