1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 275 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1600 | Colt |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 95 L |