1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | 1600 | Evora |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2576 mm |