1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 558 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 788 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 653 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |