1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1959 Abarth 2200 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 2200 | FX |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 51 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |
