1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1953 Austin A 40
To start off, 1959 Abarth 2200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 58 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1953 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | 2200 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2360 mm |
